https://www.rjmea.com/index.php/rjmea/issue/feedResearch Journal of Management and Economics Archives (RJMEA)2026-03-26T07:21:14+00:00Dr. Noor Jehanrjmeajournal@gmail.comOpen Journal Systems<p>The Research Journal of Management and Economics Archives (RJMEA) is a prestigious and multidisciplinary scholarly publication that serves as a platform for rigorous academic research and critical analysis within the realm of social sciences, focusing specifically on policy-related issues. This journal provides a forum for academics, researchers, policymakers and practitioners to contribute to and engage in discussions about contemporary societal challenges and the policy responses needed to address them.</p> <p><strong>Aims and Scope:</strong> The RJMEA aims to foster insightful discourse and disseminate high-quality research across various domains within the Social Sciences. It welcomes contributions spanning disciplines such as Management Sciences, Economics and more. The journal's scope encompasses a wide range of topics, including but not limited to:</p> <ol> <li class="show"><strong>Policy Analysis:</strong> Comprehensive examinations of policy formulation, implementation, and evaluation across local, national, and international contexts.</li> <li class="show"><strong>Social Justice and Equity:</strong> Investigations into societal inequalities, discrimination, and strategies for promoting social justice and equitable policies.</li> <li class="show"><strong>Public Administration and Governance:</strong> Studies focusing on governance structures, public institutions, administrative processes, and governance reforms.</li> <li class="show"><strong>Global Challenges:</strong> Research addressing global issues such as climate change, migration, health disparities, poverty, and international relations.</li> <li class="show"><strong>Interdisciplinary Perspectives:</strong> Exploration of interdisciplinary approaches to understanding complex societal problems and policy implications.</li> </ol> <p><strong>Editorial Process and Quality Standards:</strong> The RJMEA upholds rigorous academic standards, employing a robust peer-review process to ensure the quality, validity, and originality of published articles. Submissions undergo thorough evaluation by experts in the field, providing constructive feedback to authors to enhance the scholarly contribution of their work.</p> <p><strong>Contributions:</strong> The journal welcomes various types of contributions, including original research articles, review papers, case studies, policy briefs, book reviews, and commentaries. Each submission should present novel insights, theoretical frameworks, empirical evidence, or practical implications relevant to policy-making and social science research.</p> <p><strong>Audience and Impact:</strong> Targeted at scholars, policymakers, practitioners, and students in the social sciences and related fields, the RJMEA strives to bridge the gap between academic research and policy practice. By providing evidence-based insights and innovative perspectives, the journal aims to influence policy discourse and contribute to evidence-informed decision-making.</p>https://www.rjmea.com/index.php/rjmea/article/view/34The Impact of Organizational Culture and Work Life Balance Policies on Employee Performance: Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction2026-03-26T07:14:25+00:00Muhmmad Junaid junaid.muhammad98@gmail.com<p><em>In today’s dynamic organizational environment, enhancing employee performance has become a central priority for organizations seeking sustainable growth and competitiveness. This study investigates the impact of organizational culture and work life balance policies on employee performance, with a particular focus on the mediating role of job satisfaction. Organizational culture refers to the shared values, beliefs, and norms that shape employee behavior and organizational practices, while work life balance policies encompass organizational initiatives that help employees manage their professional and personal responsibilities effectively. Drawing on social exchange theory and human relations theory, this study posits that a supportive organizational culture and effective work life balance policies contribute to improved employee performance by enhancing job satisfaction. Empirical evidence indicates that organizational culture significantly influences employee satisfaction and performance by promoting motivation, collaboration, and engagement. Similarly, work life balance initiatives have been shown to improve employee wellbeing, reduce stress, and enhance productivity by fostering a healthier work environment. The study adopts a quantitative research design using survey data collected from employees across various sectors. Structural Equation Modeling was employed to analyze the relationships among the variables. The findings reveal that both organizational culture and work life balance policies have a significant positive impact on employee performance. Furthermore, job satisfaction partially mediates these relationships, indicating that the effectiveness of organizational practices is enhanced when employees experience higher levels of satisfaction. This study contributes to the literature by integrating organizational culture, work life balance, and job satisfaction within a unified framework. The findings provide valuable insights for managers and policymakers seeking to improve employee performance through strategic human resource practices.</em></p>2026-03-26T07:14:25+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Research Journal of Management and Economics Archives (RJMEA)https://www.rjmea.com/index.php/rjmea/article/view/35Income Inequality and Social Trust in Urban Communities: Moderating Role of Governance Quality2026-03-26T07:16:05+00:00Maria Ijaz Khanmariabb_Ijazkhan4@gmail.com<p><em>Income inequality has become a defining feature of modern urban societies, raising concerns about its impact on social cohesion and trust. Social trust, defined as the belief in the reliability and integrity of others and institutions, is essential for fostering cooperation, economic development, and societal well-being. This study examines the relationship between income inequality and social trust in urban communities, with a particular focus on the moderating role of governance quality. Drawing on social capital theory and institutional theory, the study proposes that higher levels of income inequality reduce social trust by increasing perceptions of unfairness, social distance, and exclusion. However, governance quality, characterized by transparency, accountability, rule of law, and effectiveness, is expected to moderate this relationship by mitigating the negative effects of inequality. A quantitative research design was employed, and data were collected from urban residents using structured questionnaires. Structural Equation Modeling using Smart PLS was applied to test the hypothesized relationships. The findings indicate that income inequality has a significant negative effect on social trust. This is consistent with empirical evidence showing that higher inequality undermines trust through both psychological and structural mechanisms. Furthermore, governance quality was found to significantly moderate this relationship, such that the negative impact of inequality on trust is weaker in contexts with high governance quality. Research suggests that effective governance enhances perceptions of fairness and social cohesion, thereby strengthening trust. The study concludes that while income inequality poses a threat to social trust, strong governance systems can mitigate its adverse effects. Policymakers should prioritize reducing inequality and improving governance to promote social cohesion in urban communities.</em></p>2026-03-26T07:16:05+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Research Journal of Management and Economics Archives (RJMEA)https://www.rjmea.com/index.php/rjmea/article/view/36The Effect of Leadership Styles on Organizational Performance: Moderating Role of Organizational Culture2026-03-26T07:17:44+00:00Asim Jehagriz asimj.jeh98@gmail.com<p><em>Leadership styles play a critical role in shaping organizational performance by influencing employee behavior, motivation, and overall workplace effectiveness. This study examines the impact of leadership styles on organizational performance, with a particular focus on the moderating role of organizational culture. Leadership styles, including transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire approaches, determine how leaders interact with employees and guide organizational activities. Organizational performance reflects the extent to which organizations achieve their objectives efficiently and effectively. Drawing on contemporary research, leadership styles significantly affect organizational outcomes by shaping employee engagement, productivity, and innovation. However, the effectiveness of leadership styles is not uniform across all contexts and is influenced by organizational culture, which encompasses shared values, norms, and beliefs within an organization. Studies indicate that organizational culture can either strengthen or weaken the relationship between leadership and performance. This study adopts a quantitative research design using survey data collected from employees across various organizations. Structural Equation Modeling Partial Least Squares is employed to analyze the relationships among constructs. The findings reveal that leadership styles have a significant positive effect on organizational performance. Furthermore, organizational culture moderates this relationship, enhancing the effectiveness of leadership styles in organizations with supportive and adaptive cultures. The results highlight that transformational leadership is particularly effective in fostering high performance when aligned with a positive organizational culture. Conversely, rigid or misaligned cultures may limit the effectiveness of leadership practices. This study contributes to the literature by integrating leadership styles and organizational culture within a unified analytical framework. The findings have important implications for managers and policymakers, emphasizing the need to align leadership approaches with organizational culture to achieve optimal performance outcomes</em></p>2026-03-26T07:17:44+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Research Journal of Management and Economics Archives (RJMEA)https://www.rjmea.com/index.php/rjmea/article/view/37The Impact of Work Stress on Job Satisfaction: Moderating Role of Supervisory Support2026-03-26T07:19:31+00:00Nayab Javed nayab.jjamali114@gmail.com<p><em>Work stress has become a critical issue in modern organizations, significantly influencing employees’ attitudes and performance outcomes. This study examines the impact of work stress on job satisfaction, with a particular focus on the moderating role of supervisory support. Drawing upon the transactional theory of stress and social exchange theory, the study investigates how employees’ perception of stress affects their level of job satisfaction and how supportive supervision can buffer this relationship. A quantitative research design was employed using survey data collected from employees across various sectors. Structural Equation Modeling was applied to test the hypothesized relationships. The findings reveal that work stress has a significant negative impact on job satisfaction, confirming that increased stress levels reduce employees’ satisfaction with their jobs. This is consistent with prior studies indicating that stressors such as workload, role ambiguity, and time pressure lead to dissatisfaction and burnout. Furthermore, supervisory support was found to significantly moderate the relationship between work stress and job satisfaction. Employees who perceive high levels of support from their supervisors’ experience less negative impact of stress on their job satisfaction. Supervisory support provides emotional, informational, and instrumental assistance, helping employees cope with stress effectively. The study contributes to the literature by highlighting the importance of leadership behavior in mitigating the adverse effects of work stress. It emphasizes that organizations should foster supportive supervisory practices to enhance employee well-being and satisfaction. The findings have practical implications for human resource management, suggesting that improving supervisory support can lead to higher job satisfaction even in high stress environments.</em></p>2026-03-26T07:19:31+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Research Journal of Management and Economics Archives (RJMEA)https://www.rjmea.com/index.php/rjmea/article/view/38The Impact of Employee Training on Organizational Productivity: Mediating Role of Skill Development2026-03-26T07:21:14+00:00Rizwan Akhtarak.rizwan2648@gmail.com<p><em>Employee training has become a critical strategic tool for enhancing organizational productivity in an increasingly competitive and dynamic business environment. This study examines the impact of employee training on organizational productivity, with a particular focus on the mediating role of skill development. Employee training refers to structured programs designed to enhance employees’ knowledge, competencies, and performance capabilities. Organizational productivity reflects the efficiency with which organizations utilize resources to achieve desired outputs and performance goals. Drawing on human capital theory and the resource-based view, this study argues that employee training enhances productivity by improving employees’ skills, knowledge, and work efficiency. Empirical evidence indicates that training significantly improves employee performance and productivity by enabling workers to perform tasks more effectively and achieve organizational objectives. Furthermore, skill development programs play a crucial role in enhancing employee capabilities and operational efficiency, thereby contributing to improved productivity outcomes. The study also highlights the mediating role of skill development in the relationship between employee training and organizational productivity. Training initiatives enhance employees’ technical and soft skills, which in turn improve job performance and efficiency. Research shows that skill development significantly strengthens the impact of training on employee performance and organizational outcomes. A quantitative research design was employed, with data collected from employees across various industries. Structural Equation Modeling was used to test the hypothesized relationships. The findings reveal that employee training has a significant positive effect on organizational productivity. Moreover, skill development partially mediates this relationship, indicating that training improves productivity both directly and indirectly through skill enhancement. This study contributes to the literature by integrating training, skill development, and productivity within a unified framework. The findings provide valuable insights for managers and policymakers aiming to enhance organizational performance through effective training strategies.</em></p>2026-03-26T07:21:14+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Research Journal of Management and Economics Archives (RJMEA)